Homöopathismus
Dear Marion,
one first: thank you for your beautifully written and, above all material input, which is the soothing, yet very little distinguishes ... um ... passionate, flaming your Vorposterin who has deleted their posts even now. Beautiful, so it can be discussed after all.
I am 100% with you when you write, that primary health insurance to do so being to obtain a basic health cover upright and definitely not able to do everything well for humans. I think this reason alone, because health care is already in everyday life for every human being begins. The much-touted "good life" consisting of a balanced diet, inner harmony and, above all a lot of sport it is not "on prescription", but only through your own initiative. And unfortunately, I will probably not find health insurance that I paid for the sport or organic carrots. So you're absolutely right when you lead, that a large part of health care to the people (I separate the people are very reluctant to from his body, for me is the one) 's responsibility. You also have
absolutely right that, in addition of homeopathy are also all sorts of other medical errors. Neither infusions help with a hearing loss, yet you have to leave at every opportunity, all of the white gods. Original quote, just last week told about and myself ever happened like this:
Doc: "This could be broken, we x-rayed it better times"
buddy: "What do we do when it's broken?"
Doc: "Quiet keep that together must grow by itself "
Kumel:" Aha. And what do we do if it is not broken "
Doc:" keep quiet until the bruise has healed "
. Buddy: "So in both cases the same, yes?"
Doc: "Yes ..."
buddy: "And why do I hunt then X-rays through the eggs"?
Doc: "..."
;)
doctors, regardless of student council, are people, and people can make mistakes. So far, so good.
go Moreover, our opinions differ, however.
have to defend the effectiveness of bogus medicine, is quite happy to (undisputed) faults of conventional medicine rode around, as ICHD as now done up out of sheer amusement too sometimes.
But I would note that the error of one Page no evidence of the blessing of the other side. How the world and not the other way around is not a shoe out of it:
was early 20's when I gave me a homeopathic doctor trained for two years said repeatedly there for my bad dizzy spells there is no "medical school" explanation. He put a coat hanger in one hand (as a "ground"), grabbed the other and waved profound look globules Bottle-around in front of my forehead. At my pulse response can be seen, he said, responding to whatever means my dizziness. He might as well have danced around naked around me and Morrigan, oh moon child! " can scream ...
Now that I know now that there were quite solid reasons for my problem, I wish these Vollhorst as hell as the neurologist, who suggested to me 10 years later a psychotherapy because he half his training is no longer ready had and could only think in templates. You have to appear semi-blind landing in the university hospital, before you even meet someone without a board in front of the head.
Why am I telling this? Primarily, to show that there is for every pro-anecdote, a double-story and the anecdotes are actually für'n locus, because they are not verifiable. Everyone knows someone who with this or that healer group good or bad personal experiences and has just homeopaths adorn yourself with a very emotionally charged reports of its success. This is true but just for pastors, clairvoyant, devil worshipers and hermetic magician. Jder these people will defend his teaching and is almost always with his "rich personal experience." And I could tell what wonders here about my experiences or by the brother of my neighbor, but what would that prove it? Absolutely nothing!
But personal experience is deceptive and almost imemr colored by the respective interests. That is why skeptics are right, the emotive debate to develop and more objective.
For this is no will or debate of faith, but a knowledge and policy.
Desghalb to the matter. * Ankle-knacks *;)
First scares me the gender of homeopathy and naturopathy.
The former has nothing to do with homeopathy in my opinion, secondly, the offense that the nature and generations of healers. Naturopathy is a very general term for old folk medical knowledge and, depending on the culture that include different things. He usually refers to the healing powers of plant extracts of various kinds and dosage form and knows a lot about the Biorhythm the human body. And that is basically pure biology and chemistry. And because this is so, can verify statements naturopathic quite scientifically, what-was quite contrary to your assertion, made in numerous studies as well. By the way, with some very positive results. The mold promote certain types of wound healing, we knew some places in the early Middle Ages. Science has discovered that knowledge again by chance and thus saved hundreds of thousands of lives now. The pharmaceutical industry benefits from natural healing knowledge is not limited by their teams sent in as the rain forest of Venezuela, aushorcht Indian tribes to their favorite herbs and then the the agents make arrest. Science and naturopathy? This can go well! Many areas of natural healing with modern science lessons can respond to all of us quite a fruitful symbiosis. Do we perhaps once on the Indians that are bruised wahrscheinlch to their rightful patent ...;)
should also give yourself time to ask what concept of nature shall be based on fact. For me, the fastest, most direct access to nature's most beautiful and natural science. With no other tool of thought the secrets of nature have been understood in such a profound and right.
homeopathy within the meaning of Hahnemann but, in my opinion under either natural medicine nor science but a religion. A very crude one at that.
The declarations of the active concept (water transported mysteriously field "subtle messages", "similia similibus curentur") are for me as bizarre and strange as the preparation (compounds that act without substance?) And the final composition ( see list below) of the preparations. Even the "dog mess", "crab lice" or "chimpanzee milk," not to speak of "North Pole", a homeopath would not use rnstzunehmender is definitely wrong and probably owed more to the embarrassment. :)
recognize this, would a Round google and you find not only numerous manufacturers and suppliers of kommerzielel stuff, but "experts" who speak about it.
But I digress ...
I think of Hahnemann's constructs as implausible as the idea of Christian "holy spirit" or the "Trinity" and I will get around to mentioning the religious analogy several more times. I find it difficult to respect assertions that all logic, reason and common sense, actually, each clearly contradict
(I find it even more difficult, however, to pay for it, haha!).
Basically we have a kind of medical fantasy thought up by a single Brain and through a cascade of social coincidences just become hip again. Comparable to other doctrines, such as Catholicism, Communism, or faith in the existence of flying saucers. Actually it should read "Homöopathismus. Homeopathy goes against all known laws of nature, is thus profoundly "unnatural" and entirely artificial in the ancient sense of the word. Hahnemann, and we may still sometimes write so directly, no idea of nature, not even in direct comparison with many educated contemporaries.
I also have a problem as the concept of "medicine" that's too much a battle cry, the questions will not (and probably should not be questioned). School ... to be so connected now mostly negative connotations of coercion and obedience. It is suggested that medical nachpredigen only what you have taught them from the "school" and therefore they could not think for themselves. Doctors I know are not trained at schools on a voluntary basis at universities, and in this study is a measure of independence and willingness to work demands than in any other training.
But: unfortunately, unfortunately, also protects such a university education did not appear before superstitions! Even "traditional medicine" are vulnerable to the emotional power wishful thinking. Otherwise I can not explain that there are also people who are firmly convinced that plutonium (plutonium nitrate), one of the most toxic substances in the world, in all seriousness as a medical drug for "bad dreams" is. If
ICHD aran think, then I GET schlechet dreams! :)
at precisely the GWUP whose publications I know really well, is less about riding on the evil Lancetstudie, but rather on the fact that there is still no reliable, clean out double blind and against outdated studies that prove the efficacy, as with other drugs Is commonplace. Benveniste The criminal counterfeit Pro-studies such as that of Jaques is not now make it into the meta-analysis as Lancet, the homeopathic should actually facilitate rather instead go to the barricades. Here is the goat to catch a thief.
you are, that you come to talk to empiricism, as I move on thick ice. And here are the ghosts once more: Although empirical means literally "experience", but is by no means the "technical term" for subjective experience and thus, unfortunately, very inadequate to support claims like homeopathy. In my view, empiricism is not a "technical term" but something that should be part of any good general education. Therefore: Nice that you mention it, the good old empiricism.
Yet the empirical concept, the object is put to me a too-literal, subjective and certainly not the one that wanted to dominate the Greek physicians, philosophers and naturalists with its doctrine of empiricism. Empiricism meant for men like Galen or Asklepios but not to make personal, subjective experience in the heart of the truth, do it all anyway! And this is exactly the permanent fault, the desire of abolishing these wise men!
It's not about the empirical knowledge handed down people and around the heruntergeleierte too often Tag severally Escht So many, because of the help has ". Those who think the ancient Greeks placed under the modern homeo-scene, which I lend you some months from my library of ancient philosophy and medicine. It was about them, verifiable, repeatable, objective, understandable to all experience to make. The empiricists were therefore skeptical of any form of superstition and wanted evidence of medical claims! And these great men would (and their sons in the spirit as Hume and Locke later ... and later Wittgenstein and Popper!) Live in today, they would certainly not fellow Hahne's, but would demand evidence. Consequently
was already in antiquity by most empirical thinkers recognized as the short cross and supplemented by the evidence. Latest Descartes explained to us clearly what you have to keep on without empirical evidence. can not build a house on sand, but at best a pipe dream: This starts with the basics and flat said. If the specified mode of action of an alleged system of obvious nonsense already, you * can * be the subjectively observed effect only wishful thinking and imagination. I myself prefer
thus the concept of evidence-based medicine. should be prescribed and paid for only that its effect has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt and indeed well beyond the placebo effect. And here they say to me: When in doubt, not for but against the accused, even if the data Lobby understandably loud cries and comes up with personal experience.
evidence-based medicine has also stated in the "medicine" is still not enforced and is also part of this fight really! Because it forces not only all the charlatans and mystics, but also the pharmaceutical industry and the developers of new surgical techniques to test their financially lucrative methods critically and to question and no one has you in our brave new capitalist world where the strong promise are already half the battle.
Vorposterin For your pout in peace, they sent out I was the evil man of the legions of poor chronically ill children as the irreversible destruction against. But I can just turn off my head, not even then set if you try me under emotional pressure. Another example: My grandmother
argued vehemently that their prayers to the Mother of God, they would have received for decades, healthy and that I should sometimes kindly pray for them and for myself or I would be a bad boy. I believe her even today, that their prayers have really helped, because dormer added known mountains. And yet I am absolutely opposed to Church tax and the ill-gotten wealth that has this religion with their ill-gotten promises of salvation. I did not have the slightest problem with it, the Church would from now on today all her make over the centuries bunkered homes, land and accounts to the general public would have, that something more meaningful so that instead as this Perpentum mobile called religion to keep going. For there is nunmal no God, no one listed in Heaven, whether we have sex before marriage and we are not even in hell.
These are lies.
Although these lies some help people through life fairly well.
to be in harmony with nature, means nature to concede that there, to quote Schmidt-Salomon, "with something strange."
for dubious energies that believes perceive only a minority of the population and for the past two hundred years partout can not find a law of nature is apparently no place in this nature.
Nor will of God and pink unicorns.
0 comments:
Post a Comment